A scholar—whom I prefer not to name—later assured me that (and he quoted indexes from memory) the And so I now feel free to tell, for , when the Emperor Louis came down into Italy to restore the dignity of the Holy Roman Empire. Read online or Download The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco No cost ebook pdf kindle reader on the net textbook epub digital. 1 The Name of the Rose - 01 - 2 The Name of the Rose - 02 - DOWNLOAD OPTIONS. download 1 file · ITEM TILE download.
|Language:||English, Spanish, French|
|Genre:||Children & Youth|
|ePub File Size:||26.57 MB|
|PDF File Size:||20.77 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Editorial Reviews. From Library Journal. Eco, an Italian philosopher and best- selling novelist, Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, Advanced Search · Kindle Store · Kindle eBooks · Literature & Fiction Send a free sample. Deliver to your Kindle or. THE NAME OF THE ROSE UMBERTO ECO Translated from the Italian by William Weaver A Warner Communications Company. 2. Umberto Eco — THE NAME. КБ. Eco, Umberto - Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana (Harcourt, ).epub . МБ. Eco, Umberto - Name of the Rose, The (Harcourt, ).epub. МБ.
Also available as: Not in United States? Choose your country's store to see books available for purchase. See if you have enough points for this item. Sign in. The year is
Eco's writing is so infectious, lively, and likeable that I thought it appropriate to pen my review in his style. In which I, as reader, feel used. Yes, I'm almost certain Eco wrote this thing for the sole purpose of informing us of how knowledgeable he is of the finer points of monastic orders, book trivia, and medieval philosophy. Knowing most would not put up with this crap for pages, he wisely chose to interrupt his many digressions on poverty, heretics, whether or not Jesus laughed, Ar Eco's writing is so infectious, lively, and likeable that I thought it appropriate to pen my review in his style.
Knowing most would not put up with this crap for pages, he wisely chose to interrupt his many digressions on poverty, heretics, whether or not Jesus laughed, Aristotle, architecture, etc, with an amateurish mystery plot. It's pedantry disguised as fiction. I've been used. In which the pace sucks.
Just when you thought it was getting interesting, just when the plot is getting meatier and it grabs your attention, here comes a dissertation or a long drawn description of doors, churches, parchments, beasts, characters that are totally irrelevant to the plot, and backstories that do nothing to shed light on the events. You must often wait a chapter or two to get back to the mystery that drove you to read this thing in the first place.
Do yourself a favor and quit after he has solved his first "mystery" page 25? In which its heavy-handedness is offensive.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Lurk around bookworms long enough and you're bound to find some pompous pseudo intellectual enraptured by the rich, textured, yet subtle literary clues so artfully crafted into this piece: I'm sure the late Borges heard this, face-palmed, and then turned in his grave. I have been duly informed, perhaps by the type referenced above, that Borges was actually alive when this "work" was published.
He died shortly thereafter In which the plot fails to deliver. Provided you made it as far as the end, all in hopes of finding a conclusion so stellar as to redeem the drudgery that preceded it, what one is most likely to find is disappointment. Most, by the time they get there, will already know who the culprit is, and given the setting and the tools the protagonists are carrying, what will happen in the final scene.
Is it a fantastic twist? A conspiracy centuries in the making? Just lunatic ravings akin to the ones that drove Eco to romanticize about love, lust, knowledge, etc View all comments. Beth Hunt Yup. I kn Yup. Life is too short for this crap! Walter Beth Hunt wrote: You would not believe the grief I get from people so much smarter than me for this View all 57 comments.
Go ahead, throw your tomatoes at me! I know that in general this book is loved. Many count it amongst their favorites. I found it very dull and very boring. So, if you couldn't stand it either, let me know that I am not alone. For those that loved it and are ready to launch rotten produce at me: View all 42 comments. A medieval Sherlock Holmes manages sectarian politics and investigates serial murders in a dense but effective read.
View all 12 comments. Sep 24, s. This is one of those rare near-perfect books that crosses through many genres and could be universally acclaimed. There are dozens of great reviews on here already, but this book struck me as so profound that I felt I needed to briefly put down my own thoughts. I could not bring myself to put this down and it was always a battle to not skip work and continue reading in the parking lot after lunch break.
Eco crafts a novel that could be labeled as historical fiction, mystery, theology and philoso This is one of those rare near-perfect books that crosses through many genres and could be universally acclaimed. Eco crafts a novel that could be labeled as historical fiction, mystery, theology and philosophy, metafiction, a plot-boiler, literature, and many others - hell, there's even a bit of love and sex thrown in and of multiple sexual orientations!
He essentially takes Sherlock Holmes and Watson and recasts them as monks in a 's Abbey where murder and theological debates appear around every corner. The two main plots, the murder mystery and the religious debates, weave together effortlessly, each feeding off each other as the tensions rise and the plot thickens.
This is no simple plot-driven thriller however. Eco brings a tome of medieval and christian history to the table, working it as a period piece and educates the reader as well as entertains. This book truly deserve to be considered "literature", as there is much more to it than a history and research tossed into a plot. Eco can spit prose with the best of them and he will keep your dictionary close at hand.
His character's speech is all believable and what fascinated me the most was how expertly he wrote the theological arguments between the Abbey occupants. Through these characters, many which were real people, he presents believable, and often fiery, multifaceted discussions on a range of topics such as heretics, vows of poverty, and gospel interpretations.
Eco has a vast knowledge of medieval studies and it shows. He is also a professor of semiotics, which play a critical role in this novel. William's method of deduction hinges on his ability to "read the signs" in the world around him.
The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Download Free Ebook - 8FreeBooks
He carefully crafts syllogisms, which brought me back to my logic and reasoning courses at MSU, to produce his theories. Eco puts his best foot forward and gives the reader a good introduction to his own fields of study with Rose. However, he also throws in the loophole that the world may not be comprised of any inherent meaning and that it is senseless to try to apply meaning to randomness.
This could present quiet a dilemma for a monk who's life draws meaning from the gospels. Perhaps the most exciting aspect of this novel was that it was a book about books. The whole novel spins around several texts, such as Aristotle and Revelations, but is made up of other books.
He even draws the readers attention to this as William explains to Adso how the contents of one book can be discerned by reading other books.
He strings together hefty allusions to other medieval texts and also to one of Eco's, and one of my own, personal favorite authors: Jorge Luis Borges. This novel is saturated with allusions to Borges works, there is even a blind librarian much like the real Borges named Jorge of Burgos. I would highly recommend picking up a copy of his collected fictions, simply because it is a phenomenal read, and to read selected stories such as The Library of Babel simultaneously with The Name of the Rose as Eco drew much of his inspiration for this book from Borges story.
The scenes in the labyrinthine library of the abbey are gold, I wanted to get lost with William and Adso as they flipped through great works together while trying to make sense of their obfuscating surroundings. Eco's use of metafiction greatly adds to this novel, as an acute reading will show Eco is often talking more about the book itself than the actual plot with his two leads.
He also leaves in plenty of untranslated Latin while having William conclude that true scholars must first master languages, and to key in on the idea that this book was a text found and translated by the character of Eco.
He leaves some detective work for the reader, and I thank him for that. You really need to read this book. There are scant few people who would not find something of interest within it's pages. It is a deep, dense ocean of a novel and not a little plot-driven pool to be waded through just for enjoyment, but with just a little effort it will provide a fountain of enjoyment. That was a weird, out of place and senseless string of water metaphors, but you get the idea.
View all 59 comments. View all 20 comments. Nov 15, Lawyer rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: For those who appreciate complex historical fiction. Recommended to Lawyer by: Goodreads group "Literary Explorations". Umberto Eco expects much from the reader of this book.
Almost immediately the unsuspecting reader will find himself dropped into the midst of the High Middle Ages, a society completely foreign for the majority of modern readers. In historical context, the story occurs during the time the Papacy had moved from its traditional locat "The Name of the Rose" is not a book to be picked up lightly with the expectation that you, the reader, are about to embark on a traditional work of historical fiction.
In historical context, the story occurs during the time the Papacy had moved from its traditional location in Italy to Avignon. John is not the first Pope to leave the Church's Italian home. However, it is , and great dissatisfaction pervades Europe that a French King should have political influence over the Church. Traditionally, following the division of the Roman Empire between West and East, the secular protection of the Church had fallen to the Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, a title held by members of the royal families of Germany.
Louis' entrance into Italy was inevitable, as King Phillip of France had encouraged an alliance with the "French" Pope through his connection with the King of Naples. Louis' sympathies, or perhaps his political acumen, led him to support the Franciscan Order, committed to the life of poverty. Off shoots of the Fransiscan's, particularly the Psuedo-Apostles, led by Fra Dolcino, had led to absolute chaos in Italy. Dolcino's common followers attacked the wealthy to bring about a universal state of poverty.
There should be no rich. There should be no poor. The ultimate goal of Dolcino was to abolish the need of the Church and place it under the authority of the people. Under this theory, there was no need for Popes, Cardinals, Bishops, or ecclesiastical offices of any type.
William of Baskerville's purpose in going to the Abbey of Melko is as an emissary of the Imperial Theologians to negotiate a meeting between legations appointed by the Pope and Louis to resolve the conflict between the Papacy, the Minorite or Franciscan orders, and Louis. What is at stake is a reinterpretation between Church and State.
That the underlying issue concerns who will wield true power in Europe is obvious. However, William's true mission is delayed. For, upon his arrival, he discovers that a young Illuminator in the Abbey's Scriptorium has met an untimely death. Was it murder or suicide? The death of a second monk, clearly indicates that someone in the closed society of the Abbey of Melk is a murderer. Accompanied by his scribe, Adso, William sets out to investigate the deaths of the two monks.
The mystery only deepens as more deaths occur. The circumstances seem to follow the sounding of the trumpets as revealed in the Revelation of John. Eco continues to complicate the facts of William's case by revealing that the Abbey contains one of the finest libraries known in the contemporary world.
Interestingly, no one but the Librarian, his assistant, or someone with the permission of the Abbot himself can gain entry to the library, which is protected by a labyrinth seemingly incapable of being navigated. William of Baskerville is the equivalent of a Medieval Sherlock Holmes.
Adso, whose French name happens to be Adson, conveniently rhyming with Watson. William is a man committed to logic. He is a student of Roger Bacon. He is a contemporary of William of Occam. It should come as no surprise that he is capable of the art of deduction through that logic, nor that he should be in possession of a pair of optical lenses, serving him as eyeglasses enabling him to read the tiny writing of a murdered monk, barely perceptible to the naked eye.
The monk's almost invisible writing lead William and Adso to discover the secrets of the labyrinth and to search for a book that seems to hold the motive for the accumulating bodies, day by day. The Abbot pointedly tells William that the matter of these deaths must be resolved prior to the arrival of the two legations. The Papal legation is headed by Bernard of Gui, an infamous inquisitor who has burned many a heretic in his long history as a defender of the faith.
Surely Bernard will take over the question of the deaths at the Abbey and use them to strengthen the Pope's position that the Franciscan's philosophy of the poverty of Christ be eliminated by the Pope. William and Adso's exploration of the labyrinth to discover a missing book, the seeming motive for the murders, intensify. And they succeed in discovering their way through the labyrinth.
However, they are unsuccessful in unraveling an endless thread of textual clues leading from one manuscript to the next prior to the arrival of the two opposed legations. As feared, the discovery of yet another body, the herbalist Severinus, leads Bernard Gui to take over the inquisition to root out the evil present in the abbey. Bernard is ruthless. Torture is an accepted practice to disclose the works of the devil.
The Name of the Rose
As expected, Bernard announces he intends to inform the Pope that the Franciscan orders of Poverty should be prohibited. Nevertheless, William and Adso will solve the mystery of the labyrinth, the secret manuscript it contains, and the identity of the murderer. In keeping with my practice not to reveal any spoilers of plot, I will not address the identity of the murderer, nor the motive for the crimes. But, I will say this.
While a labyrinth may contain a solution, and one may escape its twists and turns, it is not always possible to end up with an answer that leaves no ambiguity. There is more than one labyrinth present in Eco's wonderful work. One question relates to the interpretation of knowledge itself.
Is knowledge finite? Are there universal truths? Or is it a matter of what appears to be the truth only subject to interpretation by individuals? To the librarians of the Abbey Melko, knowledge was something to be protected from disclosure.
As I mentioned to one friend, the library took on the connotation of Eden's Tree of Life, from which man and woman were forbidden to eat. It was knowledge gained from eating the forbidden fruit that led to the loss of innocence. Considering that the library contained many works considered by the librarians to be the work of infidels, it would be their purpose to hide those works from the innocent.
Yet, the mere possession of that knowledge also led to its misinterpretation and the accusation of heresy. Clearly, during the heated debate between the Papal and Imperial Legations, knowledge did not exist independent of the thinker's perception. One postulation of a particular theological theorem was subject to debate on the most minute detail out of political motivation. But, Adso may well have had the most significant statement to make regarding books and their contents.
It will be one of my favorite passages: Now I realized that not infrequently books speak of books: In the light of this reflection, the library seemed all the more disturbing to me. It was then the place of long, centuries-old murmuring, an imperceptible dialogue between one parchment and another, a living thing, a receptacle of powers not to ruled by a human mind, a treasure of secrets emanated by many minds, surviving the death of those who had produced them or had been their conveyors.
A famous contemporary example is found in Nabokov's "Lolita. The story lines are quite similar. Nabokov has been said to have created artistic improprieties, or been subject to a phenomenon known as "cryptomnesia," a hidden memory of a story he had once read. Michael Marr, author of "The Two Lolitas," wrote, "Literature has always been a huge crucible in which familiar themes are continually recast That is "sub rosa.
The rose was the symbol of the Egyptian God Horus, most often represented by a child holding his finger to his mouth as if he were saying, "Shhhh. It reappears in Greek and Roman mythology.
By the Middle Ages, the rose had a definite meaning. In those times, when a party of individuals met in a council hall, a rose was hung over the table. Whatever was discussed "under the rose" was secret and all parties meeting under the rose agreed that the subject of their discussions was confidential.
Much lies under the surface of this novel. It was deemed by the characters to be secret. And so, I believe Eco would have us treat this novel in modo sub rosa, leaving each reader to discover its secrets in their own manner. The further one delves, the more secrets remain to be discovered. View all 37 comments.
Mar 11, Jason Pettus rated it it was amazing. Reprinted from the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography [cclapcenter. I am the original author of this essay, as well as the owner of CCLaP; it is not being reprinted here illegally. The CCLaP In which I read a hundred so-called "classics" and then write reports on whether or not I think they deserve the label Book 7: In one of the more fascinating stories of how a novelist was first drawn to his profession, scholar Reprinted from the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography [cclapcenter.
In one of the more fascinating stories of how a novelist was first drawn to his profession, scholar Umberto Eco was actually an Italian history professor and Medieval expert for years before ever turning to creative writing; according to legend, it was his thrilling and exacting retelling of actual Dark Age stories that inspired his friends to keep urging him to write a novel based in those times, which he finally did in the late s. As such, then, The Name of the Rose is a bizarre amalgam that you scarcely ever find in contemporary literature -- a genre actioner murder mystery with a lot of melodramatic elements at its core, but at the same time a detailed historical look at actual s Europe, with a big part of the reason to read this book being so that one can be exposed to the meticulous detail of Eco's prose on the subject, from the period's clothing and architecture to its religious structures and philosophies.
But on top of this, turns out that Eco is a postmodernist and accomplished semiotics expert as well, turning the book not just into a potboiler mystery and historical novel but indeed an entire thesis on the nature of language itself, on the meaning behind symbols, and on why human behavior repeats itself so often no matter which age you study, and no matter what the rationale behind such behavior during any given age.
Plotwise it's the story of a Franciscan monk named William of Baskerville, which is just the start of the sly references to Sherlock Holmes Eco deliberately inserts; turns out that William is also British, a champion of logic and deductive reasoning, and even has a clueless teenage assistant named Adso who stands in symbolically for the equally clueless audience.
William is in Italy, helping a fellow monk investigate a mysterious death in the fortified abbey where the man leads; turns out, in fact, that this is one of the largest and most renowned of all the Christian Dark-Age monastery libraries, attracting an international team of egghead monks and a scholarly atmosphere more akin to modern universities.
This being a murder mystery, of course, the actual plot is something best left for the reader to discover on their own, although I'll warn you that the actual "whodunit" part isn't very suspenseful; as mentioned above, the real point of this being a murder mystery is for Eco to show just how similarly humans behaved back then as we do now, even as the times themselves inspire completely different motivations and excuses.
So in other words, a lot less "I love my baby's mamma" in the s, a lot more "The devil made me do it. Fans of this novel and there are a whole lot of them; it's hard to dislike this book, frankly argue that this book deserves the "classic" label more quickly than a lot of other contemporary novels do after all, the book's only 27 years old at this point , precisely because it deals with issues from an age of classics; so in other words, because it's set in Medieval times, is written in Dark Age vernacular and includes historical details worthily accurate of the respected academe Eco is, fans claim that of course The Name of the Rose will eventually be a classic, such a foregone conclusion that we might as well declare it one now.
Ah, but there's also a much stronger argument for this being considered a classic right now; as mentioned, many of those who study the esoteric academic field of semiotics claim that the novel is a perfect example of what they do, explained in layman's terms so that non-academes can finally get it. As such, then, these people claim that The Name of the Rose is not just an exciting DaVinci-Code -style historical thriller, but also a densely layered examination of stories about stories about stories, of symbols about symbols about symbols, of the meaning behind meaning behind meaning.
Yeah, see what they mean when they say that semiotics is a hard thing to explain to the general public? The argument against: The main argument against this being a classic seems to be one brought up a lot with well-written yet contemporary books "contemporary" in this case being any less than half a century old -- that the book is simply too new to be able to reasonably judge whether it should rightly be called a timeless classic, one of those fabled "books you should read before you die.
It's a great book, even its critics are quick to point out, even if somewhat on the dry side at points ugh, all those debates about papal decrees ; but who's to say if anyone's going to even remember this novel a hundred years from now, or the notoriously spotty career Eco has since had as a novelist. Don't forget, Eco is mostly a scholar and historian; although considered a rockstar in the academic world, his reputation as a writer of fiction is much more contentious.
My verdict: So let's make it clear right off the bat -- that from a pure entertainment standpoint, The Name of the Rose is one of the most delightful novels I've read in years, years. It's funny, it's smart, it's insightful, it's thrilling, it's nerdy; Cheese And Rice, it's everything a lover of books could possibly ever want from a well-done one.
But is it a classic? Well, unfortunately, I think I'm going to have to agree with the critics on this one; that although it could very well become a classic one day, one of those Catcher in the Rye style "one-hit wonders" that populate so many lists, I think it's simply too early to make such a call either in a positive or negative way, especially considering Eco's otherwise spotty career as a novelist.
That's part of the point of "classics" lists existing, after all, and why those who care about such lists take them so seriously; because ultimately such a designation should reflect not only how good a book itself is, but how well it's stood the test of time, of how relevant it's continued to be to generation after generation, of how timeless the author's style and word-choice.
One always has to be careful when adding newish books to such lists, especially novels less than 30 years old, because we have no idea at this point how such books are going to stand the test of time; load up your classics list with such titles, and your list suddenly becomes worthless fluff, as relevant and important as a whole evening of handing out freakin' Quill Awards.
It's for this reason that I'm excluding The Name of the Rose from my own personal Canon, although still highly encourage all of you to actually read it, just from the standpoint of pure enjoyment. Is it a classic? Not yet View all 11 comments. Apr 20, Tim rated it it was amazing.
If I had to spend a year on a desert island and was only allowed to take one book, this would be it. At first glance, it may seem to be a book largely about obscure Fourteenth Century religious controversies, heresies and sects, with a murder mystery mixed in.
But this is a book that rewards repeat readings I've just finished it for the seventh time , and the heart of the novel is in its If I had to spend a year on a desert island and was only allowed to take one book, this would be it. But this is a book that rewards repeat readings I've just finished it for the seventh time , and the heart of the novel is in its exposition of semiotics - the world as a blizzard of signs and life and thought as their constant interpretation. The long controversy over the poverty of Christ and its application in the medieval Church forms the focus for a wide-ranging analysis of how ideals can motivate and inspire different people in different ways.
In this novel we find skeptics like William , mystical non-conformists like Umbertino de Casale , terrorists and revolutionaries like the Dolcinite heretics and rigid fundamentalists like Jorge and Bernard Gui.
At the time of its first publication, the parallels between the book's religious politics and modern manifestations of the same ways of thinking, including Cold War political expediency and terrorists like the Red Brigades, would have been obvious to Italian readers. It's not as daunting as many make out, but "Rose" is far from a light read.
Eco also deliberately made the first pages a difficult read, but stick with it. All those obscure politics and odd names do make some sense after a while. Secondly, many reviewers have complained about the untranslated Latin passages.
Despite what some of them have said, these are rarely more than a line or two and usually short lines at that. Medievalists will recognise most of them anyway they are quotes from the Vulgate, Occam and Aquinas and so on, and usually famous ones , but non-specialists will usually get the essence of them from their contexts.
While the mystery story forms the basis of the plot, there is a lot more to this novel than plot. The real joy of this novel is its layers of meaning, which is why it's one that can be read and re-read with new discoveries every time. It's a delight to read and great exercise for the mind and spirit, as well as a counter to those who think the Middle Ages was simply a period of superstition and ignorance.
A must read - but with your brain well and truly in high gear. View all 9 comments. View all 29 comments. Forget Christopher Hitchens. Away with that Richard Doggins guy. For a truly penetrating look at religion and atheism, Umberto Eco, he da man. The Name of the Rose is a profoundly nihilistic book. It is ostensibly a book about a murder mystery: A man, a monk rather, Brother William, arrives with his assistant, Adso, at an abbey high in the Italian Alps.
A murder has been committed, and Brother William will apply reason and logic—a Sherlock avant la lettre—to deduce the murderer.
Or does he? He d Forget Christopher Hitchens. He does indeed find out the process by which the victims die. How to download project through HMI name How to The Documents. The name, naming the name and name of the name Science.
Name of District: Name of the Block Name of the? Name of the inventory Klein Bell Activities of Daily The Picture History Of Great?
The Picture History Of Documents. Name of the Accused Name of Documents. Larousse Dictionary Of The Freshwater? Larousse Dictionary Documents.
Name of the Ministry Name of the Nominee Designation Rated 10 out of 10 by TresOoono Download Microsoft Word - 18 cyclone Author: The download utility is located in the CRS Robotics folder